I've been reviewing my writing progress for 2011 and decided I couldn't reveal my conclusions to date without recalling the parameters I'd set myself in mid-December last year- ten months ago...
So my four targets were:
1: Get a short story published- somewhere.
2: Work on at least one of my novella length stories.
3: The novel- open to decision.
4: Enter some writing competitions.
Now I have to say I've only managed two of my four targets, though the other two have received attention to a slight degree.
The first, get a short story published hasn't happened, as the contender needs a little more work and my accident interfered in a big way.
The work on the novella is underway, and the novel has had some thought- although I haven't had time to put the decisions into action.
I tidied up the synopsis where I could, and with the first three chapters entered it into the annual romance trophy competition at the writers club- I put it in to make up the numbers this year, so I already know some of the faults, but it will be interesting to see what comments it receives.
So number 4, enter some writing competitions has been the other area of progress. In January I entered the Words with Jam last few lines of a story competition. And today I finished revising my 150 words for the Mail on Sunday Novel Competition- the start of, so that will be in the post tomorrow.
If you want to enter, there is still time, you have until the 28th October to get your entry in. Details here.
So I'm going to be getting on with my novella for the remainder of the year.
This coming Saturday I'll be at Sally Quillford's Pocket Novel workshop, which I'm looking forward to and I'm sure I'll learn a lot.
Hopefully next year will be more productive.
Monday, 17 October 2011
Saturday, 15 October 2011
Yes, I Am A Writer...
I do know some writers who would deny themselves that description, but the majority of my writing acquaintances accept it.
Friday evenings I browse the online newspapers for book related items that might interest friends and provoke discussions. That was how I came across this article 'Am I a writer' in the Guardian books section by Rick Gekoski- who has had a number of non-fiction books published, and is also a book dealer.
His daughter, a forensic psychologist with numerous articles to her name ( and also a published author) said to him she was not a writer. " "It's just a job of work," she said. "There's no art in it, no imagination or creativity, and no fuss. Writers always make a fuss.""
Now perhaps that is the scientist speaking, but is 'art' the difference between factual writing and fiction?
Do writers make a fuss? Though we don't have any explanation of what type of fuss she means, so perhaps we can ignore that statement...
I suspect it is really about how we define ourselves and the terms 'writer', 'author' and 'novelist'.
This is my personal view of those terms, so they won't necessarily reflect another person's opinion, or the dictionary definitions.
I am a writer because I write (with an aim to be published). Perhaps that moment when we say we are a writer-when someone asks what we do- is when we embrace the description and accept the mantle of writer as part of our identity.
When it comes to the difference between an author and a novelist, is it only me who feels that an author is anyone who has published a book, while the novelist is a term more applicable to writers of 'literary' fiction?
I'm interested in finding out how you view both yourself and the terms mentioned, so please share your views.
Friday evenings I browse the online newspapers for book related items that might interest friends and provoke discussions. That was how I came across this article 'Am I a writer' in the Guardian books section by Rick Gekoski- who has had a number of non-fiction books published, and is also a book dealer.
His daughter, a forensic psychologist with numerous articles to her name ( and also a published author) said to him she was not a writer. " "It's just a job of work," she said. "There's no art in it, no imagination or creativity, and no fuss. Writers always make a fuss.""
Now perhaps that is the scientist speaking, but is 'art' the difference between factual writing and fiction?
Do writers make a fuss? Though we don't have any explanation of what type of fuss she means, so perhaps we can ignore that statement...
I suspect it is really about how we define ourselves and the terms 'writer', 'author' and 'novelist'.
This is my personal view of those terms, so they won't necessarily reflect another person's opinion, or the dictionary definitions.
I am a writer because I write (with an aim to be published). Perhaps that moment when we say we are a writer-when someone asks what we do- is when we embrace the description and accept the mantle of writer as part of our identity.
When it comes to the difference between an author and a novelist, is it only me who feels that an author is anyone who has published a book, while the novelist is a term more applicable to writers of 'literary' fiction?
I'm interested in finding out how you view both yourself and the terms mentioned, so please share your views.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)