This is the 20th year, and the ceremony to announce the winner "for the most embarrassing passage of sexual description in a novel" will take place on Tuesday 4th December.
I do wonder if some authors don't leave these dreadful scenes in, rather than edit them to make them better, so they can improve their chance for the shortlist and get their book publicity - no actual cost in time or money needed.
As it's really not bad publicity on the scale of everything that could be classed as bad publicity...
Others no doubt, just aren't very good at writing such scenes- though I'm sure they think they're okay at the time...
If you had the option, saying you did it deliberately is much better than admitting you write bad sex scenes... :-)
In a year that has seen the rise of 'Fifty Shades of Grey', you might expect the book to have been a sure-fire candidate. But no, and here's why.
"The purpose of the prize is to draw attention to the crude, badly written, often perfunctory use of redundant passages of sexual description in the modern novel, and to discourage it. The prize is not intended to cover pornographic or expressly erotic literature."
So that rules FSOG out...
There've been the usual newspaper articles mentioning names; the shortlist includes the following: (if you've actually read any of them, and have an opinion, do please comment.)
"For snippets from the shortlist, follow Literary Review's twitter account, @lit_review. The tweets are tagged as #LRBadSex2012."
I'll definitely be following on Twitter...